![]() In a one-page ruling, Court of Federal Claims Judge Richard A. ![]() Here you’ll find first looks to complete hands-on experiences with the latest tech on the market. View All Reviews Expert opinions and reviews on the latest gadgets, phones, laptops and more.Smartwatch and Fitness Tracker See how Apple Watch, Fitbit, Samsung Galaxy Watch, Garmin and many more stack up with our reviews.Smartphone Read trusted reviews on the latest smart phones from Apple, Samsung, Google and many more.PC & Peripheral All you need to know on the latest PC releases and whether they’re worth their dime.From consoles to RPGS and shooters, we’ve got it all here just waiting for you to read. Gaming Let expert reviewers guide you on which games to play. ![]() Gadgets & Smart Home Whether it’s a drone, a smart vacuum or noise cancelling headphones you are looking to buy, our reviewers have tried and tested it before you have to.Entertainment We spend hours watching and reviewing the latest movies, shows and music releases so you don’t have to.Car Our revheads bring you all you need to know on the coolest electric vehicles and sports cars available on the market.Camera Here you’ll find expert opinions on the latest cameras from Canon, Nikon, Sony and plenty more.NASA will resume work with SpaceX under the Option A contract as soon as possible,” the agency said in a statement. Court of Federal Claims denied Blue Origin’s bid protest, upholding NASA’s selection of SpaceX to develop and demonstrate a modern human lunar lander. “NASA was notified Thursday that the U.S. ![]() With the Blue Origin lawsuit thrown out, NASA appears to be moving forward with its SpaceX contract. NASA’s announcement provided that the number of awards the agency would make was subject to the amount of funding available for the program.” SpaceX’s bid was the highest rated and came in at $2.9 billion, far less than either Blue Origin or Dynetics.īlue Origin said in its lawsuit that if it had known that NASA was going to ignore FRRs and make cost a priority, the company “would have proposed a fundamentally different HLS design,” and it “would have engineered and proposed an entirely different architecture with corresponding differences in technical management and price scores.” Advertisementįurther Reading Here’s why Blue Origin thinks it is justified in continuing to protest NASAThe GAO dismissed both arguments, saying that “NASA did not violate procurement law or regulation when it decided to make only one award. Blue Origin said that NASA’s request for bids called for an FRR for every launch and that SpaceX’s bid only covered one of more than a dozen launches. Such meetings allow NASA officials to be briefed on what will happen during a mission, giving them an important opportunity for oversight of public-private partnerships. Jeff Bezos was more conciliatory, saying in a tweet, "Not the decision we wanted, but we respect the court’s judgment, and wish full success for NASA and SpaceX on the contract."īlue Origin claimed that, in granting the award to SpaceX, NASA ignored a requirement that bidders submit a flight readiness review (FRR) for each part of the landing systems. “Returning astronauts safely to the Moon through NASA’s public-private partnership model requires an unprejudiced procurement process alongside sound policy that incorporates redundant systems and promotes competition.” Further Reading This is probably why Blue Origin keeps protesting NASA’s lunar lander award“Our lawsuit with the Court of Federal Claims highlighted the important safety issues with the Human Landing System procurement process that must still be addressed,” Blue Origin said in a statement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |